- #Crashplan Software Free Cloud Backup#
- #Crashplan Software Plus Cloud Storage#
- #Crashplan Software Software Servers Via#
Crashplan Software Software Servers Via
Crashplan Software Free Cloud Backup
It allows for simple, self-service data restoration/migration and runs a continuous backup in the background.One of the things that makes these two competitors so difficult to separate is that they both offer a very similar service to one another. Code42 CrashPlan sends a secure, encrypted copy of your data to Code42 software servers via the CrashPlan server and Internet2 connection in the IS&T Data Center. Code42 CrashPlan is the recommended, free cloud backup solution for desktops and laptops at MIT.
...
Crashplan Software Plus Cloud Storage
This is based on the needs of the average user and the fact Backblaze is so simple to initially configure and start protecting your data with. In short I don’t think you can go far wrong with either!Looking at the test sections above it has to be a small victory for Backblaze overall. I do (personally) think it unfair they are charging an additional $2 per month over the 1 year option only to then charge users AGAIN for the storage itself (in which case what is the additional $2 charge for if the user is expected to pay for storage themselves?)Ultimate Crashplan take the win here, Backblaze are very close but I feel they need to simplify their pricing be more fair about pricing in unlimited file versioning for hose who need it.In essence Backblaze and Crashplan are two of the best cloud backup services on the market today, both work well, are easy to use and help keep your valuable data secure. The file version history can be increased, these additional versioning periods include upgrading from 30 days to 1 year for an additional $2/m and up to unlimited versioning for an additional $4/m (plus cloud storage costs).As can be seen in the table above both services are basically priced at the same amount for a single device with unlimited storage and unlimited file version history, Backblaze does come out slightly behind Crashplan, however, because of their additional cloud storage fees for any file versions kept which are over 1 year old (although their B2 cloud storage is very low).For a long time Backblaze stuck to their 30 day max version history so it is good to see users now have access to much longer versioning periods if they require them. It must be stressed about the limitations they have on external drives though so keep this in mind before making a decision if might be an issue!Crashplan offers very simple pricing of $10 per device, per month, this includes unlimited storage and unlimited file version history, simple!Backblaze have a slightly more convoluted pricing structure whereby the basic service is $6 / month, per device for unlimited storage and 30 days of file version history. Photographer, freelancer etc.) then Crashplan is a must!A little earlier on I mentioned about the set-up of Backblaze being slightly more automatic than Crashplan, add in to this the mobile apps and the ability to have large restores sent directly on an external HDD and it is a small win for Backblaze in the usability section.
Both of which are not ideal so make sure your needs align in a way that neither of these will be a problem.Crashplan does not have these external drive limitations and their pricing is clear and simple to understand, this is possibly a better choice for small business / freelance users who have a lot of data and make use of multiple external drives regularly.
0 kommentar(er)
